Mapping the Environmental Impact Footprint of Cities, Companies, and Household

  1. FS
  2. PR
  3. FR①
  4. FR②
  5. FR③
  6. FR④
  7. FR⑤

2021

PL Photo Project Leader

KANEMOTO Keiichiro

RIHN

I am an Associate Professor of Research Institute for Humanity and Nature. Before that, I was a Lecturer of Institute of Decision Science for a Sustainable Society at Kyushu University and Faculty of Economics and Law at Shinshu University. From 2009 - 2011, I was a visiting research fellow at Integrated Sustainability Analysis, the University of Sydney. I received my Ph.D. in 2014 from Tohoku University. In 2018, 2019, and 2020, I was named a Highly Cited Researcher in the fiel of Cross-Field by Clarivate Analytics.

>> Annual Report
Researchers at RIHN
NGUYEN, Tien HoangSenior Researcher
TAHERZADEH, Oliver AhrashSenior Researcher
LEE, JemyungSenior Researcher
KATAFUCHI YuyaSenior Researcher
FAHMI, MuhamadResearcher
FARABI-ASL, HadiResearcher
LI, XinmengResearcher
TAKATA ShokoResearch Associate

Abstract

A recent study in Nature showed that up to a third of biodiversity loss is driven by trade, and a body of other studies have identified the same pattern for GHG emissions, air pollution, and other environmental ills. Many environmental impacts worldwide are ultimately driven by consumption in developed countries. Considerations of remote responsibility, ecological footprint, and scope 3 emissions are now a standard part of the environmental policy discussion at many levels, from the UNFCC to individual businesses and households.

Providing better information to buyers and decisionmakers can be a powerful way to reduce environmental pressures worldwide. The life-cycle analysis (LCA) and supply chain analysis tools (multi-regional input-output (MRIO) models) used to analyze these remote effects in detail have benefited from significant advances in the past years, with improving models and, more recently, the link of economic models to spatial (GIS) maps that locate more precisely how global supply chains link to particular emissions and biodiversity hotspots.

However, while existing work sketches out the broad picture, it still falls short of being detailed enough to help with many specific decisions. Existing supply chain analyses operate at the resolution of countries and broad economic sectors. In practice decision-makers at these levels often only have limited effective economic and judicial power. Many individuals, businesses, and local governments are seeking to reduce their total environmental footprint, but existing models are either too coarse resolution to be truly useful or require expensive and time-consuming modifi cations to be useful for informing specific decisions.

Unlike most studies, which focus on environmental emissions and international trade, this is the first study to clarify the effect of global supply chains on environmental impacts. Further, in addition to countries and regions, we will estimate the environmental footprint of cities, companies, and households. The proposed project would be a major contribution and can be expected to be of high interest to businesses, policymakers, NGOs, sustainability consultants, and researchers around the world. The project team has deep experience in supply chain analysis and environmental impact assessment.

Results:

In 2018, we estimated the carbon footprint of 13,000 cities. Globally, we find carbon footprints are highly concentrated in a small number of dense, high-income cities and affluent suburbs. 100 cities drive 18% of global emissions. In most countries (98 of 187 assessed), the top three urban areas are responsible for more than one-quarter of national emissions.

In 2019, we identified five key results about Japanese food diet from the Japanese carbon footprint (CF) household study. First, differences in household demographics (age and sex) do not explain variation in household food CF. Second, regional differences in foodrelated CF exist, but these are not the main explanatory factor of household differences. Third, household income and savings are weakly correlated with food-related CF. Fourth, there is 1.9 times higher in food CF between the mean household in the lowest and highest quartile. Finally, meat consumption is almost identical across the four quartiles, and it is rather consumption of fish, vegetables, confectionary, alcohol, and restaurants that differentiates high and low CF households.

In 2020, we estimated carbon footprint of Japanese and Indian cities. In the Indian study, we show the eradication of extreme poverty does not conflict with ambitious climate change mitigation in India. However, our analysis suggests CF reduction policies within India need to target high-expenditure households, as they are responsible for nearly seven times more carbon emissions than lowexpenditure households (living on $1.9 consumption a day). In the Japanese study, we construct household CF inventories for 1172 Japanese cities using detailed consumer expenditure data and a Japanese domestic multiregional input-output (MRIO) model. We identify the consumption activities which city policymakers can target to reduce CF. We observe a strong concentration of household CF in a few cities in Japan: 40% of the total Japanese CF is driven by 143 cities.

The concept fi gure of the environmental footprint of cities.

The concept fi gure of the environmental footprint of cities.

The carbon footprint of Asian cities.

The webpage screenshot of the carbon footprint cities

▲PAGE TOP